Podcast: Play in new window | Download (19.5MB)
2: The Experiment Begins
A few weeks had passed since George and his daughters had agreed to embark on their experiment. They had spent countless hours brainstorming and researching different methods to distinguish fact from belief, truth from opinion.
Finally, they had settled on a plan that seemed both practical and insightful.
The family gathered around the dining table, armed with notebooks, pens, and a sense of anticipation. They had decided to create a series of scenarios, each designed to test the validity of their beliefs and ideas. The goal was to objectively evaluate the evidence and come to a consensus on what was true and what was merely a matter of personal belief.
Their first scenario revolved around the topic of money management, an area where George held strong convictions. He believed that investing in real estate was the most secure and profitable way to grow one’s wealth. His daughters, on the other hand, argued that investing in the stock market could yield higher returns. To settle the debate, they decided to conduct a comparative analysis.
They each invested a sum of money, with George purchasing a property and his daughters investing in a diversified portfolio of stocks. Over the course of a year, they meticulously tracked their investments, recording every gain and loss. At the end of the experiment, they analyzed the data together.
To their surprise, the results were inconclusive. George’s property had appreciated in value, but the stock market had also experienced significant gains. It became evident that both approaches had their merits, and the notion of a single “correct” way to manage money was subjective.
Undeterred, they moved on to their next scenario, this time focusing on world politics. George firmly believed that a strong military was essential for maintaining peace and stability in the world. His daughters, however, argued that diplomacy and international cooperation were more effective
in resolving conflicts.
To test their theories, they decided to examine historical events where military intervention and diplomatic negotiations had been employed. They researched case studies, analyzed the outcomes, and engaged in passionate debates. Yet again, they found that the truth was not black and white.
While military intervention had sometimes achieved short- term objectives, it often resulted in long-lasting consequences and unintended collateral damage. On the other hand, diplomatic negotiations had successfully resolved conflicts, but they required patience, compromise, and a willingness to listen to opposing viewpoints.
As they delved deeper into their experiment, George and his daughters realized that their initial goal of distinguishing fact from belief was overly simplistic. They began to understand that truth was multifaceted, influenced by a myriad of factors such as personal experiences, cultural backgrounds, and individual perspectives.
With each scenario, their discussions became more nuanced and insightful. They started to appreciate the value of diverse viewpoints and the importance of empathy in understanding
others. The experiment had not only challenged their preconceived notions but also fostered a deeper connection between them.
Excited by their progress, they eagerly looked forward to the next chapter of their experiment, ready to delve further into the intricacies of life, living, and getting along with people.
They had come to understand that the journey itself was as valuable as any destination, and that true understanding could only be achieved through open-mindedness, curiosity, and a willingness to challenge their own beliefs.
I’m interrupting again.
Our being willing to challenge our own beliefs is probably a virtue of sorts; but as self-centered and self-serving as my pragmatic self prefers being, I suspect that I’m not alone with my pragmatism. And therein lies the problem, the crack in my carefully cultivated system of beliefs. If all of us adopt this “Me first” approach to life and living, we quickly find ourselves in a pseudo-Darwinian video game where only the most ruthless survive. Me has precedence over us, person has precedence over people, power has precedence over weakness, will has precedence over law, interests have precedence over values, and the winners take all. – Back to our story.